FOTRIC 225 vs FLUKE TiS75 Infrared Thermal Imaging Camera Comparison
What's the difference between the FOTRIC 225 and FLUKE TiS75 handheld thermal cameras?
Key Differences
FOTRIC 225 | FLUKE TiS75 |
|
|
In-Depth Specification Comparison
|
FLUKE TiS75 |
Fotric 225 |
Advantages |
Market Price |
$4,999.00 |
$ 2,999.00 |
Fotric 225 is Cost effective |
Market |
MRO |
R&D and MRO |
R&D users require more functions than maintenance users. 225 is more suitable for R&D users |
IR Resolution |
320 x 240 |
320 x 240 |
Medium and high-end thermal imager resolution |
Temperature Range |
-20~550℃ -4~1,022°F |
-20~650℃ -4~1,202°F |
Fotric 225 has a wider temperature range |
Accuracy |
±2°C(±3.6°F) or 2% |
±2°C(±3.6°F) or 2% |
Professional grade temperature measurement accuracy |
LCD Screen |
3.5” |
5.5”, 720P or higher |
225 is paired with 5.5” large full HD touchscreen |
Temperature Analysis |
3 spots, 1 center box |
8 spots, 1 line, and 8 boxes |
225 can read and analyze more data instantly, convenient for field use |
Focus |
Manual |
Manual |
Manual focused lens is better for R&D with clearer thermal images |
Minimum Focus Distance |
0.15m (0.5ft) |
0.15m (0.5ft) |
Can see smaller objects. |
Fully-Radiometric Short Video* |
N/A |
Support |
225 can record fully-radiometric thermal video with the smartphone with up to 1,000 frames |
Battery |
4 hours |
10 hours |
225 can last for 1-day work under normal use without charging or replacing the battery |
Fixed Installation |
N/A |
Tripod; Test bench |
225 can be installed on the tripod while an adapter needs to be purchased to install TiS75 on the tripod |
* Fully-radiometric short thermal video stream refers that each frame of the video stream preserves the original temperature of each pixel. |
Note: Information is collected from the internet and for reference only.